home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: erinews.ericsson.se!usenet
- From: Jonas Elfstrom <jonas@plea.se>
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Subject: Re: EIDE vs. IDE , was: Reports from CeBit
- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 1996 10:25:13 +0000
- Organization: PLEA http://plea.se/
- Message-ID: <31528009.71A2@plea.se>
- References: <Pine.BSD/.3.91.960320130638.11700B-100000@sos.sos.net> <4ishv7$jfr@kaon.kuai.se>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: klpc010.ericsson.se
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (WinNT; I)
-
- Anders Karlsson wrote:
- >
- > In a message of 20 Mar 96 Pete and Vicki wrote to :
- >
- > PaV> Have none of the engineers at Amiga Technologies got any experience
- > PaV> with good multitasking/multi-user operating systems? IDE/EIDE just
- > PaV> DOES NOT CUT IT! Aaaaargh, you'd think they'd learn after the
- > PaV> A4000/A1200.
- >
- > The A4k/A1k2 HD-interface was a common IDE interface. Not EIDE. EIDE
- > has better performance and can have 4 devices instead of 2. FYI..
-
- I thought that EIDE was two separate (a bit faster) IDE interfaces.
-
- --
- / Jonas Elfstrom (5+ rows .sigs sux) jonas@plea.se \
- < Amiga, Linux, ISP, C, 680x0/6502. Guinness. Suede, Oasis, SP. >
- \ We are here to PLEAse you. +46 19 322010 http://www.plea.se/
-